Home All Groups Group Topic Archive Search About

Latent Exchange settings causing System State backup failure?

Author
12 Jan 2009 6:31 PM
Venger
Greetings...

Had Exchange 2003 on a Windows 2003 box with AD. Added Exchange 2007 to
the Org, moved everything, everythings been running fine for months.

Uninstalled Exchange 2003 on the old box. Mail works fine, but now
getting a hanging backup using Backup Exec 12D fully updated when
grabbing the System State.

System shows it is backing up the System State and stopping on
AD\DC=ourdomain...\CN-ExchangeLegacyInterop and the file is listed as
sAMAccountType. I noticed that the ExchangeLegacyInterop group appears
to be only used in orgs that need 2003-2007 mailflow. Is it safe to
delete this group from AD using either adsiedit or ADUaC? Does this
group server any purpose in a single 2007 fully migrated Exchange
environment? I think not, but don't start deleting from AD on a whim...
just possibly speculating this latent group may be causing a problem
with our backup.

Thanks for any additional info or suggestions...

Venger

Author
20 Jan 2009 12:29 PM
bushlyed
On Jan 12, 12:31 pm, Venger <ven***@mail.com> wrote:
Show quoteHide quote
> Greetings...
>
> Had Exchange 2003 on a Windows 2003 box with AD. Added Exchange 2007 to
> the Org, moved everything, everythings been running fine for months.
>
> Uninstalled Exchange 2003 on the old box. Mail works fine, but now
> getting a hanging backup using Backup Exec 12D fully updated when
> grabbing the System State.
>
> System shows it is backing up the System State and stopping on
> AD\DC=ourdomain...\CN-ExchangeLegacyInterop and the file is listed as
> sAMAccountType. I noticed that the ExchangeLegacyInterop group appears
> to be only used in orgs that need 2003-2007 mailflow. Is it safe to
> delete this group from AD using either adsiedit or ADUaC? Does this
> group server any purpose in a single 2007 fully migrated Exchange
> environment? I think not, but don't start deleting from AD on a whim...
> just possibly speculating this latent group may be causing a problem
> with our backup.
>
> Thanks for any additional info or suggestions...
>
> Venger

Here is what Venger posted in the Cowboys newsgroup after he said he
would never darken the group again:

I see you and your retarded submissive gimp are polluting the
Cardinals
newsgroup with your cross-posted idiocy. Choking the meager life out
of
their newsgroup now that you've turned the Cowboys group into a fetid
sh*tpile?

Perhaps the Cowboys woeful turn of events is just karma for having
turds
like Obsessor and the pederast Bushlyed in the fanbase.

Cardinal fans, you deserve better having made your first Super Bowl
than
to have to listen to these inbred miscreants. On behalf of Cowboys
fans,
good luck, and our apologies about these two turds - if abortion were
legal in the 127th trimester, we'd have solved the problem for you.

=======

This was a personal vindictive attack upon me and another person when
we did nothing to him.

What is terribly hypocritical of Venger is the fact that people can
post anything that want, off topic, so long as it agrees with him, but
post something disagreement and he goes ape like.

You see his vicious, malicious, foul-mouth attack of people in his
posts, always starting the personal attacks then getting all huffy
when people respond in kind.

He is just mad because the world is changing today and there is
nothing an insignificant person like him can do about it.

Vengiebaby, I don't feel your pain but I certainly am enjoying it.