|
exchange
newsgroups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Disable Out of Office AssistantIs there a way to avoid users to enable Out of Office Assistant on their
Outlook 2003 connected to Exchange 2003? The option under Internet Message Formats -> Advanced is unchecked but still users can send OOO messages. Thanks a lot. Ricky NoName <non***@noname.com> wrote:
> Is there a way to avoid users to enable Out of Office Assistant on No, you can't disable it in E2003. You can keep it from going to the > their Outlook 2003 connected to Exchange 2003? > The option under Internet Message Formats -> Advanced is unchecked but > still users can send OOO messages. > > Thanks a lot. > > Ricky Internet (which is what the tickmark does) but you can't stop them from using it internally. I'm honestly not sure why you'd want to - it's a useful feature - but to each his own. On Wed, 13 May 2009 09:46:44 -0400, Lanwench [MVP - Exchange] wrote:
> I want to stop them to go to the internet but I checked and it seems that> No, you can't disable it in E2003. You can keep it from going to the > Internet (which is what the tickmark does) but you can't stop them from > using it internally. I'm honestly not sure why you'd want to - it's a useful > feature - but to each his own. > mails are going outside with the thickmark unchecked. NoName NoName <non***@noname.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 13 May 2009 09:46:44 -0400, Lanwench [MVP - Exchange] wrote: Are you sure you're on the right server?> >> >> No, you can't disable it in E2003. You can keep it from going to the >> Internet (which is what the tickmark does) but you can't stop them >> from using it internally. I'm honestly not sure why you'd want to - >> it's a useful feature - but to each his own. >> > > I want to stop them to go to the internet but I checked and it seems > that mails are going outside with the thickmark unchecked. > > NoName And again, what's the reason for doing this? OOF is incredibly useful to most folks. On Wed, 13 May 2009 13:06:16 -0400, Lanwench [MVP - Exchange] wrote:
> I'm on the right server (I have only one server).> Are you sure you're on the right server? > > And again, what's the reason for doing this? OOF is incredibly useful to > most folks. > The reason is simple: I have a tool to create this reply message following the compnay policy and I don't want every single user to create his own OOF message. NoName NoName <non***@noname.com> wrote:
Show quoteHide quote > On Wed, 13 May 2009 13:06:16 -0400, Lanwench [MVP - Exchange] wrote: What utility is this and does it not require that OOF to the Internet be > >> >> Are you sure you're on the right server? >> >> And again, what's the reason for doing this? OOF is incredibly >> useful to most folks. >> > > I'm on the right server (I have only one server). > The reason is simple: I have a tool to create this reply message > following the compnay policy and I don't want every single user to > create his own OOF message. > > NoName enabled? Is autoreply to the internet or autoforward to the internet enabled, by chance? 
Other interesting topics
Calenda sharing problems
2 email addresses in Outlook/Exchange is it possible: exchange databases to be programmed directly? 2003 AD+Exchange - Renaming mail-enabled security groups? SCP in AD Pictures not showing up in email Error when moving mailboxes from Exchange Manager on my PC Exchange 2003 Becomes Unresponsive Microsoft Updates & Blackberry server Providing redundancy to Exchange server 2003 Standard Edition |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
