|
exchange
newsgroups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
hosted exchange emailHi all,
Could anyone recommend a good economical web host that supports the following requirements: Hosted Exchange Email (Multiple Email Domains) Windows Mobile/Blackberry Connectivity Outlook Client Access Outlook Web Access Admin Control Panel to add/modify users/email aliases/distribution groups ASP.Net Web Hosting (Multiple Domains) SSL Option SQL Server Option FTP Access Merchant Services Option TIA! On Mon, 29 Jun 2009 14:48:54 -0500, <param@community.nospam> wrote:
Show quoteHide quote >Hi all, 1. Where are you?> >Could anyone recommend a good economical web host that supports the >following requirements: > >Hosted Exchange Email (Multiple Email Domains) >Windows Mobile/Blackberry Connectivity >Outlook Client Access >Outlook Web Access >Admin Control Panel to add/modify users/email aliases/distribution groups >ASP.Net Web Hosting (Multiple Domains) >SSL Option >SQL Server Option >FTP Access >Merchant Services Option > >TIA! > 2. SQL and FTP? What do you want those for in an Exchange hosting environment? 1. California.
2. Because I am looking for a dual purpose web host - website hosting & exchange/email hosting. Show quoteHide quote "Mark Arnold [MVP]" <m***@mvps.org> wrote in message news:t99i4550c5hvihae3hdqabglno5re7ee9c@4ax.com... > On Mon, 29 Jun 2009 14:48:54 -0500, <param@community.nospam> wrote: > >>Hi all, >> >>Could anyone recommend a good economical web host that supports the >>following requirements: >> >>Hosted Exchange Email (Multiple Email Domains) >>Windows Mobile/Blackberry Connectivity >>Outlook Client Access >>Outlook Web Access >>Admin Control Panel to add/modify users/email aliases/distribution groups >>ASP.Net Web Hosting (Multiple Domains) >>SSL Option >>SQL Server Option >>FTP Access >>Merchant Services Option >> >>TIA! >> > > 1. Where are you? > 2. SQL and FTP? What do you want those for in an Exchange hosting > environment? Well, I see a ton in the CA geo but I can't recommend any to you.
Why do they have to be physically located where I am at? They could be
anywhere in the world as far as I am concerned as long as they are reputable... Show quoteHide quote "Mark Arnold [MVP]" <m***@mvps.org> wrote in message news:1t3l451uisqr0egtqddhlda2dkjvc5el1f@4ax.com... > Well, I see a ton in the CA geo but I can't recommend any to you. On Mon, 6 Jul 2009 10:10:35 -0500, <param@community.nospam> wrote:
>Why do they have to be physically located where I am at? They could be They don't, but if all of your users are wandering around CA, OR, WA,>anywhere in the world as far as I am concerned as long as they are >reputable... > NV etc. etc. it would be relatively dumb to use a hoster whose main data center was in PA or the UK, or in Ulan Bator etc. If your users are global then yeah, use one from anywhere. 
Other interesting topics
User's Mailbox on Exchange reporting Larger that actual size.
Exchange 2k3 backup and restore using ntbackup System Attendant OWA blocked by logon restriction full backup is not flushing the logs Exchange/outlook on two computers Offline Defrag error on Exch 2003 Ent server Exchange 2003 - making space Sync different Exchange calendars upgrade to Exchange 2007 now or wait for 2010? |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
