Home All Groups Group Topic Archive Search About

Co-Location of Exchange Server

Author
6 Apr 2006 3:30 PM
Kris
Hi All & MVPs,
I have a question and would like to have an expert advise regarding.Exchange
Server Co- Location. At present we have exchange Server located in our
company premisis which serves to 1500+ employees What is your openion about
Co-location. The nearest ISP is 150 + Kms. Do you suggest to go with  the
existing setup to be in the company or opt for ISP.Note: There are less
remote users and all users are with in the compnay only few users who are on
vacation or business trip use webmail access to see the email.

I am doing a fesibility study in this regards. Kindly advise and if you
could give me any documents or presentations or website links which supports
your suggestion i appricate. If i get advantages and disadvantages of the
proposed solution would be greatful.

Thanking you.

Best Regards

Author
6 Apr 2006 6:13 PM
Mark Arnold [MVP]
On Thu, 6 Apr 2006 08:30:02 -0700, Kris
<K***@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote:

Show quote
>Hi All & MVPs,
>I have a question and would like to have an expert advise regarding.Exchange
>Server Co- Location. At present we have exchange Server located in our
>company premisis which serves to 1500+ employees What is your openion about
>Co-location. The nearest ISP is 150 + Kms. Do you suggest to go with  the
>existing setup to be in the company or opt for ISP.Note: There are less
>remote users and all users are with in the compnay only few users who are on
>vacation or business trip use webmail access to see the email.
>
>I am doing a fesibility study in this regards. Kindly advise and if you
>could give me any documents or presentations or website links which supports
>your suggestion i appricate. If i get advantages and disadvantages of the
>proposed solution would be greatful.
>
>Thanking you.
>
>Best Regards

What are your business drivers? Why do you thin you want to look into
this? What issues are you suffering, if any, that make you think you
want to have a look at co-lo?
Author
6 Apr 2006 11:15 PM
Kris
Thank Mark.

I am instructed to develop a report a fesibility study? I understand its not
feasible but i would like to give 10+ good reasons to management with the
facts based on above scenario.

Best Regards



Show quote
"Mark Arnold [MVP]" wrote:

> On Thu, 6 Apr 2006 08:30:02 -0700, Kris
> <K***@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote:
>
> >Hi All & MVPs,
> >I have a question and would like to have an expert advise regarding.Exchange
> >Server Co- Location. At present we have exchange Server located in our
> >company premisis which serves to 1500+ employees What is your openion about
> >Co-location. The nearest ISP is 150 + Kms. Do you suggest to go with  the
> >existing setup to be in the company or opt for ISP.Note: There are less
> >remote users and all users are with in the compnay only few users who are on
> >vacation or business trip use webmail access to see the email.
> >
> >I am doing a fesibility study in this regards. Kindly advise and if you
> >could give me any documents or presentations or website links which supports
> >your suggestion i appricate. If i get advantages and disadvantages of the
> >proposed solution would be greatful.
> >
> >Thanking you.
> >
> >Best Regards
>
> What are your business drivers? Why do you thin you want to look into
> this? What issues are you suffering, if any, that make you think you
> want to have a look at co-lo?
>
>
Author
7 Apr 2006 4:27 AM
Lanwench [MVP - Exchange]
"Kris" <K***@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:2F688E31-0ACB-4CD1-B8FA-9DC24ED327A7@microsoft.com...
>
> Thank Mark.
>
> I am instructed to develop a report a fesibility study? I understand its
> not
> feasible but i would like to give 10+ good reasons to management with the
> facts based on above scenario.

Hi - you have posted this message twice in this group, and also at least
once once in another group (I replied to that one). To make this experience
easier for everyone (including you) in the future, please don't "multipost."
If you need to post to multiple groups, it's best to *crosspost* instead, by
posting a single message to a handful of relevant groups (separate the group
names with commas) so that everyone can follow the thread.

This will also be a lot easier if you stop using the web interface to the
groups and start using a newsreader such as Outlook Express, Forte Agent,
etc. It's a lot easier to do nearly everything that way, including
searching, which is always a good idea to do before you post, as well as
mark messages to be watched, and filter based on replies to your posts.

The Microsoft public news server is news.microsoft.com and you can subscribe
to as many groups as you like.


Show quote
>
> Best Regards
>
>
>
> "Mark Arnold [MVP]" wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 6 Apr 2006 08:30:02 -0700, Kris
>> <K***@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote:
>>
>> >Hi All & MVPs,
>> >I have a question and would like to have an expert advise
>> >regarding.Exchange
>> >Server Co- Location. At present we have exchange Server located in our
>> >company premisis which serves to 1500+ employees What is your openion
>> >about
>> >Co-location. The nearest ISP is 150 + Kms. Do you suggest to go with
>> >the
>> >existing setup to be in the company or opt for ISP.Note: There are less
>> >remote users and all users are with in the compnay only few users who
>> >are on
>> >vacation or business trip use webmail access to see the email.
>> >
>> >I am doing a fesibility study in this regards. Kindly advise and if you
>> >could give me any documents or presentations or website links which
>> >supports
>> >your suggestion i appricate. If i get advantages and disadvantages of
>> >the
>> >proposed solution would be greatful.
>> >
>> >Thanking you.
>> >
>> >Best Regards
>>
>> What are your business drivers? Why do you thin you want to look into
>> this? What issues are you suffering, if any, that make you think you
>> want to have a look at co-lo?
>>
>>

AddThis Social Bookmark Button