|
exchange
newsgroups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Co-Location of Exchange ServerHi All & MVPs,
I have a question and would like to have an expert advise regarding.Exchange Server Co- Location. At present we have exchange Server located in our company premisis which serves to 1500+ employees What is your openion about Co-location. The nearest ISP is 150 + Kms. Do you suggest to go with the existing setup to be in the company or opt for ISP.Note: There are less remote users and all users are with in the compnay only few users who are on vacation or business trip use webmail access to see the email. I am doing a fesibility study in this regards. Kindly advise and if you could give me any documents or presentations or website links which supports your suggestion i appricate. If i get advantages and disadvantages of the proposed solution would be greatful. Thanking you. Best Regards On Thu, 6 Apr 2006 08:30:02 -0700, Kris
<K***@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote: Show quote >Hi All & MVPs, What are your business drivers? Why do you thin you want to look into>I have a question and would like to have an expert advise regarding.Exchange >Server Co- Location. At present we have exchange Server located in our >company premisis which serves to 1500+ employees What is your openion about >Co-location. The nearest ISP is 150 + Kms. Do you suggest to go with the >existing setup to be in the company or opt for ISP.Note: There are less >remote users and all users are with in the compnay only few users who are on >vacation or business trip use webmail access to see the email. > >I am doing a fesibility study in this regards. Kindly advise and if you >could give me any documents or presentations or website links which supports >your suggestion i appricate. If i get advantages and disadvantages of the >proposed solution would be greatful. > >Thanking you. > >Best Regards this? What issues are you suffering, if any, that make you think you want to have a look at co-lo? Thank Mark.
I am instructed to develop a report a fesibility study? I understand its not feasible but i would like to give 10+ good reasons to management with the facts based on above scenario. Best Regards Show quote "Mark Arnold [MVP]" wrote: > On Thu, 6 Apr 2006 08:30:02 -0700, Kris > <K***@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote: > > >Hi All & MVPs, > >I have a question and would like to have an expert advise regarding.Exchange > >Server Co- Location. At present we have exchange Server located in our > >company premisis which serves to 1500+ employees What is your openion about > >Co-location. The nearest ISP is 150 + Kms. Do you suggest to go with the > >existing setup to be in the company or opt for ISP.Note: There are less > >remote users and all users are with in the compnay only few users who are on > >vacation or business trip use webmail access to see the email. > > > >I am doing a fesibility study in this regards. Kindly advise and if you > >could give me any documents or presentations or website links which supports > >your suggestion i appricate. If i get advantages and disadvantages of the > >proposed solution would be greatful. > > > >Thanking you. > > > >Best Regards > > What are your business drivers? Why do you thin you want to look into > this? What issues are you suffering, if any, that make you think you > want to have a look at co-lo? > > "Kris" <K***@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message Hi - you have posted this message twice in this group, and also at least news:2F688E31-0ACB-4CD1-B8FA-9DC24ED327A7@microsoft.com... > > Thank Mark. > > I am instructed to develop a report a fesibility study? I understand its > not > feasible but i would like to give 10+ good reasons to management with the > facts based on above scenario. once once in another group (I replied to that one). To make this experience easier for everyone (including you) in the future, please don't "multipost." If you need to post to multiple groups, it's best to *crosspost* instead, by posting a single message to a handful of relevant groups (separate the group names with commas) so that everyone can follow the thread. This will also be a lot easier if you stop using the web interface to the groups and start using a newsreader such as Outlook Express, Forte Agent, etc. It's a lot easier to do nearly everything that way, including searching, which is always a good idea to do before you post, as well as mark messages to be watched, and filter based on replies to your posts. The Microsoft public news server is news.microsoft.com and you can subscribe to as many groups as you like. Show quote > > Best Regards > > > > "Mark Arnold [MVP]" wrote: > >> On Thu, 6 Apr 2006 08:30:02 -0700, Kris >> <K***@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote: >> >> >Hi All & MVPs, >> >I have a question and would like to have an expert advise >> >regarding.Exchange >> >Server Co- Location. At present we have exchange Server located in our >> >company premisis which serves to 1500+ employees What is your openion >> >about >> >Co-location. The nearest ISP is 150 + Kms. Do you suggest to go with >> >the >> >existing setup to be in the company or opt for ISP.Note: There are less >> >remote users and all users are with in the compnay only few users who >> >are on >> >vacation or business trip use webmail access to see the email. >> > >> >I am doing a fesibility study in this regards. Kindly advise and if you >> >could give me any documents or presentations or website links which >> >supports >> >your suggestion i appricate. If i get advantages and disadvantages of >> >the >> >proposed solution would be greatful. >> > >> >Thanking you. >> > >> >Best Regards >> >> What are your business drivers? Why do you thin you want to look into >> this? What issues are you suffering, if any, that make you think you >> want to have a look at co-lo? >> >> |
|||||||||||||||||||||||