|
exchange
newsgroups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
CO-LOCATION OF EXCHANGE SERVERHi All & MVPs,
I have a question and would like to have an expert advise regarding. Exchange Server Co- Location. At present we have exchange Server located in our company premisis which serves to 1500+ employees What is your openion about Co-location. The nearest ISP is 150 + Kms. Do you suggest to go with the existing setup to be in the company or opt for ISP.Note: There are less remote users and all users are with in the compnay only few users who are on vacation or business trip use webmail access to see the email. I am doing a fesibility study in this regards. Kindly advise and if you could give me any documents or presentations or website links which supports your suggestion i appricate. If i get advantages and disadvantages of the proposed solution would be greatful. Thanking you. Best Regards Kris My primary consideration would be bandwidth. You are going to need an awful
lot of it to support 1500 users. An AWFUL lot of it! I don't think you would realize any cost savings, so what are you hoping to gain? Show quote "Kris" <K***@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:87D3FCF5-06F1-445A-B21D-406D0CE48192@microsoft.com... > Hi All & MVPs, > I have a question and would like to have an expert advise regarding. > Exchange Server Co- Location. At present we have exchange Server located > in our company premisis which serves to 1500+ employees What is your > openion about Co-location. The nearest ISP is 150 + Kms. Do you suggest to > go with the existing setup to be in the company or opt for ISP.Note: > There > are less remote users and all users are with in the compnay only few users > who are on vacation or business trip use webmail access to see the email. > > I am doing a fesibility study in this regards. Kindly advise and if you > could give me any documents or presentations or website links which > supports > your suggestion i appricate. If i get advantages and disadvantages of the > proposed solution would be greatful. > > Thanking you. > > Best Regards > Kris > Thank you Martin
How do i convence this to my management. Can you suggest any documents ,links or proof that i can tell that there is no use in going for the co-location server. How do i say this. I might have to give a evidence or do a presentation. If you have a sample list of advantages or disadvantes technically or put in feasiblity study. Thank you once again.. Show quote "Martin Blackstone - MVP" wrote: > My primary consideration would be bandwidth. You are going to need an awful > lot of it to support 1500 users. > An AWFUL lot of it! I don't think you would realize any cost savings, so > what are you hoping to gain? > > "Kris" <K***@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message > news:87D3FCF5-06F1-445A-B21D-406D0CE48192@microsoft.com... > > Hi All & MVPs, > > I have a question and would like to have an expert advise regarding. > > Exchange Server Co- Location. At present we have exchange Server located > > in our company premisis which serves to 1500+ employees What is your > > openion about Co-location. The nearest ISP is 150 + Kms. Do you suggest to > > go with the existing setup to be in the company or opt for ISP.Note: > > There > > are less remote users and all users are with in the compnay only few users > > who are on vacation or business trip use webmail access to see the email. > > > > I am doing a fesibility study in this regards. Kindly advise and if you > > could give me any documents or presentations or website links which > > supports > > your suggestion i appricate. If i get advantages and disadvantages of the > > proposed solution would be greatful. > > > > Thanking you. > > > > Best Regards > > Kris > > > > > Ill have to check my archives.
I know at one time we had a discussion about the amount of bandwidth used by each Outlook client. How much do you have now? I honestly don't think you are going to find any supporting documentation anywhere unless its marketing documentation from an outsourcing provider. You will probably have to research this yourself unless some other poor soul has had to do the same. Show quote "Kris" <K***@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:28BA887E-90D8-4AE1-AC67-9F300AFAF892@microsoft.com... > Thank you Martin > > How do i convence this to my management. Can you suggest any documents > ,links or proof that i can tell that there is no use in going for the > co-location server. How do i say this. I might have to give a evidence or > do > a presentation. If you have a sample list of advantages or disadvantes > technically or put in feasiblity study. > > Thank you once again.. > > > "Martin Blackstone - MVP" wrote: > >> My primary consideration would be bandwidth. You are going to need an >> awful >> lot of it to support 1500 users. >> An AWFUL lot of it! I don't think you would realize any cost savings, so >> what are you hoping to gain? >> >> "Kris" <K***@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message >> news:87D3FCF5-06F1-445A-B21D-406D0CE48192@microsoft.com... >> > Hi All & MVPs, >> > I have a question and would like to have an expert advise regarding. >> > Exchange Server Co- Location. At present we have exchange Server >> > located >> > in our company premisis which serves to 1500+ employees What is your >> > openion about Co-location. The nearest ISP is 150 + Kms. Do you suggest >> > to >> > go with the existing setup to be in the company or opt for ISP.Note: >> > There >> > are less remote users and all users are with in the compnay only few >> > users >> > who are on vacation or business trip use webmail access to see the >> > email. >> > >> > I am doing a fesibility study in this regards. Kindly advise and if you >> > could give me any documents or presentations or website links which >> > supports >> > your suggestion i appricate. If i get advantages and disadvantages of >> > the >> > proposed solution would be greatful. >> > >> > Thanking you. >> > >> > Best Regards >> > Kris >> > >> >> >> Hi Martin,
Please could you search the document realted to bandwith requirement so that i can use it in my reporting. If you could list 10+ advantages or disadvantages for the colocation serverwhich is 150 Kms. away can't serve 2500 users. Thanking you once again Show quote "Martin Blackstone - MVP" wrote: > Ill have to check my archives. > I know at one time we had a discussion about the amount of bandwidth used by > each Outlook client. How much do you have now? > > I honestly don't think you are going to find any supporting documentation > anywhere unless its marketing documentation from an outsourcing provider. > You will probably have to research this yourself unless some other poor soul > has had to do the same. > > "Kris" <K***@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message > news:28BA887E-90D8-4AE1-AC67-9F300AFAF892@microsoft.com... > > Thank you Martin > > > > How do i convence this to my management. Can you suggest any documents > > ,links or proof that i can tell that there is no use in going for the > > co-location server. How do i say this. I might have to give a evidence or > > do > > a presentation. If you have a sample list of advantages or disadvantes > > technically or put in feasiblity study. > > > > Thank you once again.. > > > > > > "Martin Blackstone - MVP" wrote: > > > >> My primary consideration would be bandwidth. You are going to need an > >> awful > >> lot of it to support 1500 users. > >> An AWFUL lot of it! I don't think you would realize any cost savings, so > >> what are you hoping to gain? > >> > >> "Kris" <K***@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message > >> news:87D3FCF5-06F1-445A-B21D-406D0CE48192@microsoft.com... > >> > Hi All & MVPs, > >> > I have a question and would like to have an expert advise regarding. > >> > Exchange Server Co- Location. At present we have exchange Server > >> > located > >> > in our company premisis which serves to 1500+ employees What is your > >> > openion about Co-location. The nearest ISP is 150 + Kms. Do you suggest > >> > to > >> > go with the existing setup to be in the company or opt for ISP.Note: > >> > There > >> > are less remote users and all users are with in the compnay only few > >> > users > >> > who are on vacation or business trip use webmail access to see the > >> > email. > >> > > >> > I am doing a fesibility study in this regards. Kindly advise and if you > >> > could give me any documents or presentations or website links which > >> > supports > >> > your suggestion i appricate. If i get advantages and disadvantages of > >> > the > >> > proposed solution would be greatful. > >> > > >> > Thanking you. > >> > > >> > Best Regards > >> > Kris > >> > > >> > >> > >> > > >  |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Other interesting topics