|
exchange
newsgroups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Email rejectionHello,
We have a user that is running outlook 2000, And we have an exchange 5.5 server. When he sends to one specific adress inside the company he gets a rejection but anyone else can send to this adress at anytime. Thanks, dave On Fri, 2 Jun 2006 10:32:02 -0700, dhaven
<dha***@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote: >Hello, Interesting. And what is this message? Have you got it to hand that>We have a user that is running outlook 2000, And we have an exchange 5.5 >server. When he sends to one specific adress inside the company he gets a >rejection but anyone else can send to this adress at anytime. > > >Thanks, >dave you can post here? The following recipient(s) could not be reached:
David Maines on 6/2/2006 12:06 PM Unable to deliver the message due to a recipient problem MSEXCH:MSExchangeIS:Conklin:MPFS-CO03 Show quote "Mark Arnold [MVP]" wrote: > On Fri, 2 Jun 2006 10:32:02 -0700, dhaven > <dha***@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote: > > >Hello, > >We have a user that is running outlook 2000, And we have an exchange 5.5 > >server. When he sends to one specific adress inside the company he gets a > >rejection but anyone else can send to this adress at anytime. > > > > > >Thanks, > >dave > > Interesting. And what is this message? Have you got it to hand that > you can post here? > > > can other people send to this recipient?
Show quote "dhaven" <dha***@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:EA5DA591-6C1B-4EC6-8025-F257F1D41174@microsoft.com... > The following recipient(s) could not be reached: > > David Maines on 6/2/2006 12:06 PM > Unable to deliver the message due to a recipient problem > MSEXCH:MSExchangeIS:Conklin:MPFS-CO03 > > > "Mark Arnold [MVP]" wrote: > >> On Fri, 2 Jun 2006 10:32:02 -0700, dhaven >> <dha***@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote: >> >> >Hello, >> >We have a user that is running outlook 2000, And we have an exchange 5.5 >> >server. When he sends to one specific adress inside the company he gets >> >a >> >rejection but anyone else can send to this adress at anytime. >> > >> > >> >Thanks, >> >dave >> >> Interesting. And what is this message? Have you got it to hand that >> you can post here? >> >> >> Yes, Anyone else inside or outside the company.
Show quote "seth" wrote: > can other people send to this recipient? > > "dhaven" <dha***@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message > news:EA5DA591-6C1B-4EC6-8025-F257F1D41174@microsoft.com... > > The following recipient(s) could not be reached: > > > > David Maines on 6/2/2006 12:06 PM > > Unable to deliver the message due to a recipient problem > > MSEXCH:MSExchangeIS:Conklin:MPFS-CO03 > > > > > > "Mark Arnold [MVP]" wrote: > > > >> On Fri, 2 Jun 2006 10:32:02 -0700, dhaven > >> <dha***@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote: > >> > >> >Hello, > >> >We have a user that is running outlook 2000, And we have an exchange 5.5 > >> >server. When he sends to one specific adress inside the company he gets > >> >a > >> >rejection but anyone else can send to this adress at anytime. > >> > > >> > > >> >Thanks, > >> >dave > >> > >> Interesting. And what is this message? Have you got it to hand that > >> you can post here? > >> > >> > >> > > > Dhaven
Have the user that is unable to send check his contacts. If he has a contact for the user he is having difficulties with, delete it. save the info first. Mike M [MSFT] Show quote "dhaven" wrote: > Yes, Anyone else inside or outside the company. > > "seth" wrote: > > > can other people send to this recipient? > > > > "dhaven" <dha***@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message > > news:EA5DA591-6C1B-4EC6-8025-F257F1D41174@microsoft.com... > > > The following recipient(s) could not be reached: > > > > > > David Maines on 6/2/2006 12:06 PM > > > Unable to deliver the message due to a recipient problem > > > MSEXCH:MSExchangeIS:Conklin:MPFS-CO03 > > > > > > > > > "Mark Arnold [MVP]" wrote: > > > > > >> On Fri, 2 Jun 2006 10:32:02 -0700, dhaven > > >> <dha***@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote: > > >> > > >> >Hello, > > >> >We have a user that is running outlook 2000, And we have an exchange 5.5 > > >> >server. When he sends to one specific adress inside the company he gets > > >> >a > > >> >rejection but anyone else can send to this adress at anytime. > > >> > > > >> > > > >> >Thanks, > > >> >dave > > >> > > >> Interesting. And what is this message? Have you got it to hand that > > >> you can post here? > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > > And you're sure the user is selecting the recipeitn specifically from
the GAL. Just accepting the autofill within Outlook is not something you should come back and say. Compose a fresh mail, do it the long way and find the user in the GAL. I am going to check to see if he is using the GAL, But i found somehting on
Google that caught my eye, I found a posting that made comment about the x-400 adresess in exchage, I found this user doesnt have any x-400 entries. Show quote "Mark Arnold [MVP]" wrote: > And you're sure the user is selecting the recipeitn specifically from > the GAL. Just accepting the autofill within Outlook is not something > you should come back and say. Compose a fresh mail, do it the long way > and find the user in the GAL. > Yes he is sending from the GAL, He has tried both ways, Fom the GAl And from
his contact list. None work Dave Show quote "dhaven" wrote: > I am going to check to see if he is using the GAL, But i found somehting on > Google that caught my eye, I found a posting that made comment about the > x-400 adresess in exchage, I found this user doesnt have any x-400 entries. > > "Mark Arnold [MVP]" wrote: > > > And you're sure the user is selecting the recipeitn specifically from > > the GAL. Just accepting the autofill within Outlook is not something > > you should come back and say. Compose a fresh mail, do it the long way > > and find the user in the GAL. > > I suggest reinstalling his OS and Outlook from scratch - probably save you
more time. Although it may be a problem with his user account. Show quote "dhaven" <dha***@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:E6A3F96E-B13C-472B-8750-CB6089CBBAD2@microsoft.com... > Yes he is sending from the GAL, He has tried both ways, Fom the GAl And > from > his contact list. None work > > Dave > > "dhaven" wrote: > >> I am going to check to see if he is using the GAL, But i found somehting >> on >> Google that caught my eye, I found a posting that made comment about the >> x-400 adresess in exchage, I found this user doesnt have any x-400 >> entries. >> >> "Mark Arnold [MVP]" wrote: >> >> > And you're sure the user is selecting the recipeitn specifically from >> > the GAL. Just accepting the autofill within Outlook is not something >> > you should come back and say. Compose a fresh mail, do it the long way >> > and find the user in the GAL. >> > before reinstalling the OS i would look at a couple things.
try sending a message with OWA and try logging on another system and sending message through outlook if the problem still occurs then you've ruled out the possibility of the system being the issue and won't have to spend time rebuilding it for nothing Show quote "Paul" <p***@home.com> wrote in message news:%23$$ZN5ohGHA.3756@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl... >I suggest reinstalling his OS and Outlook from scratch - probably save you >more time. Although it may be a problem with his user account. > > "dhaven" <dha***@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message > news:E6A3F96E-B13C-472B-8750-CB6089CBBAD2@microsoft.com... >> Yes he is sending from the GAL, He has tried both ways, Fom the GAl And >> from >> his contact list. None work >> >> Dave >> >> "dhaven" wrote: >> >>> I am going to check to see if he is using the GAL, But i found somehting >>> on >>> Google that caught my eye, I found a posting that made comment about the >>> x-400 adresess in exchage, I found this user doesnt have any x-400 >>> entries. >>> >>> "Mark Arnold [MVP]" wrote: >>> >>> > And you're sure the user is selecting the recipeitn specifically from >>> > the GAL. Just accepting the autofill within Outlook is not something >>> > you should come back and say. Compose a fresh mail, do it the long way >>> > and find the user in the GAL. >>> > > > Absolutley, as would getting the user up off his backside and trying
another machine.  
Other interesting topics
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
